At the bottom of the article we have listed our previous coverage of the exciting aspects of AI, but now we will explore some of the potential pitfalls:. Perhaps the major fear about AI is that it will force journalists out of a job. Is that a well-founded fear?
There is no job security guarantee, but we have to remember that current revenue problems are not based on AI. You can look at AI from two perspectives, one that AI will replace journalists through cost-cutting due to advertising disappearing, or AI can do much of the basic tasks of the newsroom leaving the tasks that people are good at.
Will there come a time when there will exist two tiers of newsrooms; those who can afford the new standard of tools and those who cannot? Will this be harmful in a similar way as the imbalance between local and global news is now? One way to work around this is to connect and collaborate with big tech organisations such as Facebook or Google. The big technology platforms and tools have creators or investors that might have biases we as journalists disagree with.
Are we giving away too much power to them? Facebook, for example, is at one end of the extremes as a media company and on the other an unregulated editor of the internet. This creates another spectrum where on the one end you have issues of freedom of speech and on the other a complete lack of transparency and a lot of power moving away from the news organisations. We have not thought through this yet, because we need technology and users. We try to shake hands with big tech platforms, which might not have any knowledge about or share our conscious about what journalism should be, so we have to ask ourselves if we can we share all our data with them.
Maybe NPOs or some open source organisations might develop the same things, we have to do this, but we have to be careful.
If something can be exploited, someone will exploit it. How can we prepare for the increasing exploitation of the tools as they become more dominant in the industry? If your goal is to sow misinformation the opportunities will be there, but on the flip side the USP of a news organisation is trust. The problem we face now is news organisations not leveraging that trust which makes them special, we have not been good at promoting that. We already saw this in the American election with bots being used to produce and spread fake news; that it is easy for people to use wrong information, and that subtle opinions can be changed to sway readers in certain directions.
But this happens with every technology, some use it in the right way, some use it in the wrong way. What safety advice would you give organisations and outlets for preparing for or surviving in the future? What role does trust play for you, are you a trust first organisation, do you bake in a layer of trust into every aspect of your organisation?
Think about how you can be transparent about your finances, about your processes and your relationship with your audience. The second thing is to employ people who understand both network theory how people use the internet, communicate , and computational thinking how can I as a human formulate this problem so it can be understood by a computer. If you can build that understanding and critical thinking into your news organisation then you have a lot of the tools necessary to survive an avalanche of misinformation.
Prepare by focusing on security of course, you now have to have a security person in the team, someone who is an expert on data protection, confidentiality and so on. Make sure to also get an ethics person who can help uphold strict journalistic standards.
For survival I think the ecosystem will change, maybe outlets will come to alliances, moving from ten papers covering all the same stories to splitting the coverage into areas where every one of them has a specific strength and collaboration on a better whole complete picture.
Will we all have to become basic pay freelancers and retrain every six months to be prepared for the constant changes in technology and fads? I see more freelancers than I used to. It strikes me smart people who want to work in news under the age of 35 are going freelance or moving into PR and communications.
This brain drain is a real worry. It is perfectly possible now with a mail chimp account, a medium blog and a twitter handle to set up something that will rival the New York Times technology section or debate or insight section.
I think that has to be cherished though and news organisations have to do more to find the year old in their bedroom getting 18 million views on their gaming channel. It is of course great then that we have these events to pull people together. I myself am a freelancer and I have noticed that when the shift to online came, the outlets focused on making sure their sites looked like they were flooded with news, they have eternal amounts of news to create now and we become like factory workers.
Before we fear, we have to understand the components. We need people to teach us what these components are which make this kind of conference very useful. Which aspect have you picked up on that makes you personally worry for the future? The shift away from advertising revenue, news organisations are still not nervous enough about this. A lot of time because the power is stacked at the top of the news organisation, making it difficult to make deep institutional changes that allow you to be more agile.
We need to orient around delivering to a specific audience and listening to them. When you lose local journalism you lose community cohesion, political awareness on a really important level. Those things have deep, deep impacts beyond journalism and into the fabric of society.
I am not very worried, but readers have to train themselves to learn and train themselves, not necessarily to understand the code itself, but to understand the platforms and how they work and how that can be exploited. We need a generally higher level of media, social and technological literacy for everyone. We must not forget that AI is not just a journalistic challenge. In his talk, Hello Robot: A new prohuman agenda for journalism, he reminded the audience that they were constantly surrounded and outnumbered by robots already.
Easily by a factor of 1,5 or 2 when we recognise that every mobile phone and laptop is a robot. Even Vienna itself, as a smart city, is a robot we live in. It will arrive in less than 50 years and be a complete game changer on every level:. There are two concepts major concepts to consider when we reach superintelligence, Dataism and Transhumanism.
At some point computers will be able to emulate, reproduce or replace everything a human is or could be. The main challenge that journalism will be some of the few who can be able to help tackle will be to ensure humanity wakes up to this truth, and start to seriously consider our unavoidable new man-machine hybrid society:.
According to Thun-Hohenstein stronger and stronger AI is unavoidable, but a constructive embrace of the technology is not impossible, it simply demands a better global understanding of its implications:.
We all have to understand the whole panorama of exponential progress and collectively choose a border between man and machine we feel comfortable with. Will AI be a threat to journalism? Sign in Get started. Never miss a story from Global Editors Network , when you sign up for Medium.
Get updates Get updates.More...